Opinion about William Bennet's 1998 Quote on Education Essay

Opinion about William Bennets 1998 Quote on Education - Essay ExampleThis phenomenon is still, however conceptually unclear to many people and few view how it impacts the schools on which the legitimation operates (Neal & Kirp, 1985 2000). There are various aspects of the modern schooling which have been concealed. These include the deterioration such a legalization system imposes in the morality of students and teachers versus that of the parents. The parents have no say when it comes to choosing their childrens teachers. There is not much information given(p) on teachers because of the protection of such information by law. Interestingly, the State knows so little about it. In this confusion, the teachers who are disposed have no idea of each others information (State University, 2011). duplication of knowledge has been proposed as the best way to go for developing countries. Yet, we have restrictions on copyright materials. It is common knowledge that not every student go fort h invent new ideas. Setting up legal restrictions on who can use the education materials and how, poses a great challenge for those who might not spend the cost. As can be seen, the Copyright Act gives a number of exceptional situations to the above law. Protecting the authors work is good, but this has an put in on limiting the number of people who can access them. This brings about discrimination since not all students will have the money to afford procure of such materials (Neal & Kirp, 1985 2000). The legalization of education system in the 1950s brought about the entry of minorities into the public schools that practiced segregation. However this exposed them to greater problems of chaos and ceaseless violence, which in most cases went unpunished leading to the white flight to private institutions of learning (State University, 2011). Legalizations of education institutions are mostly aimed at making the schools a contributive place for all to acquire education. However gi ven the restrictions imposed on the teachers and the administration, the schools lose focus on their main missions and objectives. The legalization leads to the known de-emphasis on the education process and learning, which are meant to be the basic tenets of institutional establishments in the first place. With the growth of the state into a more litigious status, the schools have become take down more bureaucratic in the process. It is truly appalling since learning institutions are supposed to be flexible and nurtures of change, efficiency and effectiveness. Yet many agree that schools, specially institutions of higher learning are the most bureaucratic establishments in the current society. It is like copying the government system and perfecting the art of bureaucracy (State University, 2011). Given the legalization processes, the school administrators turn institutions into fiefdoms as places of exercising their unchecked authority. Principals have had to meet out serious an d unfair punishments to teachers who are in record for having questioned their status quo. The restrictions given to education institutions could still be looked at as one way of the governments evasion of responsibility for what goes on in these schools. Instead of organism fully involved in the process, the state takes an oversight role and leaves the backlog of problems to the school authorities who end up misusing such powers. Laws alone without a extreme implementation and